When companies lose a deal, the explanation is almost always the same.
“We lost on price.”
Price becomes the default explanation. It’s convenient. It’s simple. It protects everyone involved.
But sometimes price clearly wasn’t the issue. The competitor was more expensive. Discounts were offered and the deal still stalled. The buyer chose a smaller vendor with fewer features.
That’s when the explanation shifts from blaming price to blaming the buyer.
You hear it in phrases like:
“They didn’t understand the value.” “They weren’t ready.” “They just didn’t get it.”
These explanations all say the same thing: the buyer made a bad decision. The buyer was irrational.
That belief is everywhere in business. It’s rarely stated directly, but it quietly shapes how companies explain lost deals.
And it’s wrong.
Why This Belief Is Dangerous
Calling buyers irrational feels satisfying because it protects the seller’s worldview. If the buyer was irrational, then nothing is wrong with the product. Nothing is wrong with the sales process. Nothing is wrong with how value was communicated. The problem was the buyer.
But that explanation comes with a cost: it shuts down learning.
If the buyer was irrational, there’s nothing to investigate. The deal was simply unwinnable. Companies move on without asking harder questions. And they lose the same kinds of deals again … and again.
How Buyers Actually Decide
Economists have studied decision-making for decades using a concept called utility theory. The idea is simple: people choose the option that maximizes the benefit they expect to receive, given what they believe will happen.
That doesn’t mean buyers have perfect information or analyze every option. It means their decision makes sense from their perspective.
When a buyer evaluates a purchase, they’re comparing three possible futures:
- Future A: Keep the money. Maintain the current situation.
- Future B: Spend the money. Adopt your solution.
- Future C: Spend the money. Adopt a competitor’s solution.
The buyer chooses the future that looks best to them. If they reject your offer, either the price made it less attractive, or the value they expected from your solution was smaller than the value they expected elsewhere.
Every lost deal comes down to price and value. But here’s the deeper insight: Value is not the benefit your product creates. Value is the benefit the buyer can imagine.
The Buyer’s Mental Model
Buyers don’t evaluate your product directly. They evaluate a mental model of what will happen if they buy it — one shaped by the results they expect, the risks they see, how difficult implementation will be, how colleagues will react, and whether their own reputation is on the line.
Two buyers looking at the same product can construct completely different futures. One imagines improvement and success. Another imagines disruption, risk, and blame if something goes wrong. Both are acting rationally. They’re simply optimizing for different outcomes.
This is why sellers who believe they have the best product still lose deals. The product isn’t what’s being evaluated. The future is.
The Real Irrational Behavior
The irrational behavior isn’t the buyer’s decision. It’s the seller’s assumption that buyers are irrational.
Once sellers adopt that belief, they stop trying to understand how buyers actually think. They repeat the same presentations, emphasize the same features, explain the same value the same way, and lose the same kinds of deals again and again.
A better assumption is that the buyer made a rational decision. Now ask the only question that matters.
What did the buyer see that we didn’t?
What future did they imagine? Did they believe that future would happen? What risks mattered most? What value did they fail to see and why?
When you start asking those questions, lost deals become valuable sources of insight. Because every lost deal reveals something about how buyers perceive value. And when sellers misunderstand that perception, a gap forms between the value the seller believes they offer and the value the buyer believes they will receive.
That gap has a name: Buyer Disconnect.
Share your comments on the LinkedIn post.
Understanding it is where better selling begins.
Now, go make an impact!
Tags: b2b sales, buyer decision, buyers, price, pricing, sales, value
