Over the last four weeks I wrote about Product Myopia, the belief that value lives in the product rather than the future it creates. If you missed that series, the short version is this: most companies are organized around their product, and that orientation suppresses the willingness to pay they already earned.
This week I want to introduce the antidote. A way of thinking called Buyer-First.
Product-first vs. Buyer-First
Ask most companies what they do and they will describe their product. Features, capabilities, how it works, what it does. That is product-first thinking. The product is the center of the conversation, and the buyer is expected to translate what they hear into something that matters to them.
Buyer-First flips the question. Instead of asking what does our product do, it asks how does our buyer see our product. What problems are they living? What results do they need? What does their world look like after the problem is gone?
Same product. Completely different conversation.
The difference sounds simple. It is harder to execute than it appears. Most companies have spent years, sometimes decades, building language, marketing, pricing, and sales processes around the product. Shifting to Buyer-First requires seeing your own product through a completely different lens, the buyer’s lens.
What Buyer-First Looks Like in Practice
Pasha Hawaii is a shipping company. They move containers between the Mainland and Hawaii. A product-first description of what they do sounds like this: container shipping services, refrigerated container shipping, fixed sailing schedules, intermodal services, EDI capabilities.
All accurate. All beside the point.
Let’s look at Pasha Hawaii from a large retailer’s point of view. Notice that Buyer-First starts somewhere else entirely.
Large retailers don’t buy Mainland-to-Hawaii container shipping. They buy dependable product availability across Hawaii stores. Every service Pasha offers maps to a problem that retailer is living: unpredictable replenishment rhythms, inventory availability gaps, perishable freight exposure, high-manual coordination costs, excess planning buffers, concentrated supply chain risk.
The conversation changed. And that conversation is the one that builds a business case, earns a price premium, and closes the gap between the value Pasha delivers and the value their buyers can see and believe.
That is Buyer-First thinking. It starts with the buyer’s world and works back to the product. The product features still matter, but only in support of the desired business outcomes.
Why This Is Hard
Buyer-First requires knowing your buyer’s world at a level most companies rarely reach. Specific problems a specific buyer is living, in their own language, connected to real consequences they can quantify.
That knowledge comes from conversations with buyers, careful documentation of what they said, and disciplined translation of their problems into the language of results. It is real work, and it requires someone willing to stay with the buyer’s problem long enough to understand it at that level of specificity.
I have been building a custom tool that does exactly this. We give it a product and a buyer and it produces a Buyer-First view of the relationship, the problems the buyer is living, the results they need, and the language that connects your product to their world. I am operating it on behalf of a small number of companies who want to see their own product the way their buyers do. Reach out if you are interested.
If you have been following the Product Myopia series and recognizing your own company in it, Buyer-First is where the work begins. Stop describing what your product does. Start describing what your buyer gets.
My new book, Buyer Disconnect, goes deep on exactly this. Sign up here to be notified the moment it launches.
Share your comments on the LinkedIn post.
Now, go make an impact!
Tags: buyer, Buyer Disconnect, buyer first, buyer outcomes, buyer strategy, buyer value, buyer-first, customer problems, customer value, value
